970000 Activities of households as employers of domestic personnel
A six-digit type of NOGA 2025, in division 97, Activities of households as employers of domestic personnel.
Where it sits
- Section
- U Activities of Households as Employers and Undifferentiated Goods- and Service-producing Activities of Households for Own Use
- Division
- 97 Activities of households as employers of domestic personnel
- Group
- 970 Activities of households as employers of domestic personnel
- Class
- 9700 Activities of households as employers of domestic personnel
- Type
- 970000 Activities of households as employers of domestic personnel
Its name in four languages
- Deutsch
- Private Haushalte mit Hauspersonal
- Français
- Activités des ménages en tant qu’employeurs de personnel domestique
- Italiano
- Attività di famiglie e convivenze come datori di lavoro per personale domestico
- English
- Activities of households as employers of domestic personnel
What it includes
- This type includes households’ employment of domestic personnel (for example, cooks, cleaners, gardeners, chauffeurs, caretakers, babysitters, personal assistants).
- This allows the employed domestic personnel to state the activity of their employer in censuses or studies, even though the employer is an individual. The product produced by this activity is consumed by the employing household.
What it excludes
- provision of personal and household services (e.g. cleaning, ironing, cooking, gardening, homecare services for dependents) by service providers (for-profit, not-for-profit, public organisations or self-employed), see the appropriate NOGA type according to the service provided
NOGA 2008 codes it continues
Since the switch to NOGA 2025, companies coded under these NOGA 2008 types belong under 970000, in the share the BFS measured in its business register (BUR).
| NOGA 2008 | Share moved to 970000 |
|---|---|
| 970000 | 100% |
What a NOGA code is, and how to find a company's code
Company counts cover the 145,068 of 782,904 active companies in the commercial register that Prospex has coded so far, from their registered purpose and website, so they are a floor. Geneva is 93% coded, because its cantonal register publishes a code per company; the other cantons 11% so far. They are Prospex's codes, not the code the BFS assigns in its business register (BUR). Codes, labels and notes: Swiss Federal Statistical Office (BFS), NOGA 2025, through the I14Y interoperability platform and the KUBB coding tool.